6 replies to this topic

[Fat Tony]

OK, it's time for Adam to go.

[Jabba the Hutt]

yup.

one of us should volunteer either Deb or WK for the lynchin'

Edited by Jabba the Hutt, 11 June 2007 - 10:06 PM.

[Jabba the Hutt]

okay, i took a big chance but it may payoff.

i Pm'ed that Bacon dude and told him that i had a very strong suspicion that Deb was a mob member but as she is "tight" with Adam and WK, they'd protect her. i told him that he and i (and possibly you) would have to go after Deb. i also told him i thought that WK was the other mobster but wasn't sure yet.

is this unethical?

[Fat Tony]

Probably.

But, I've never been one for ethical behavior.

[Dave]

Jabba the Hutt, on Jun 11 2007, 08:10 PM, said:

is this unethical?

If you PMed as yourself and not as the Jabba character, then yes, it is not in the spirit of the game. I take that as part of the learning process of this first go-around.

Remember that the original game is played at a table. No one can pass secret notes to each other. You already have the advantage of knowing each other and speaking within this hidden forum. The lynching discussion should, in my opinion, stay in the public thread (this is also the generally accepted guideline).

By the way, do you think you two could successfully wack someone? That'd be cool, but hey, no big deal. It's not like the name of the game is Mafia or anything...

[Jabba the Hutt]

oops. sorry. seemed like a brilliant tactical move at the time. (besides, i wanted to see if my hunch about Bacon was correct--it was)

[Jabba the Hutt]

okay, assuming we are successful at taking out Adam and Deb is lynched, one of us must immediately vote to lynch WK. Because of the possibility of the "tie" thing, WK must have the votes first.

unless.... that bacon fellow is actually someone of importance.

thoughts?