Jump to content


Misfitopia pop culture forum
- - - - -

Dawn of the Dead (2004): crap or not crap?


6 replies to this topic

Poll: Dawn of the Dead (2004): crap or not crap? (6 member(s) have cast votes)

Dawn of the Dead (2004): crap or not crap?

  1. Crap (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. Not crap (6 votes [100.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 100.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Dave

    head idiot

  • Admin
  • 7,356 posts
  • no information
  • no information
  • Nine Inch Nails
  • Ohio State Buckeyes
  • New York Jets
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information

Posted 10 November 2009 - 03:49 PM

On Frank's prodding, I finally saw the Dawn of the Dead remake. I liked the first one but expected very little out of this redo. Frank kept saying how awesome it was, so I finally borrowed it. It was 10x better than anything I could have possibly wanted. Watched it twice and with the commentary. Didn't care about most of the extras, but I did like the headshot doc.

Not crap.
Maximum Awesome
"Proceed counterinductively." --Paul Feyerabend

#2 Chad

    Misfitopia Icon

  • Moderator
  • 10,126 posts
  • no information
  • no information
  • Batman
  • WWE
  • kitty lover
  • (1) Merit Bar of Super Importance
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information

Posted 11 November 2009 - 12:46 AM

Not crap, but I'm only a fan of the newer zombie movies.
In The Heavyskies and The Chad Identity
“Every way of life produces its own environment and in turn is influenced by that environment.” ― Hugh Nibley

#3 Frankie Pitt

    Atari 2600

  • Team Awesome
  • 363 posts

Posted 11 November 2009 - 04:35 AM

I voted "Not Crap" because it's not. Also because, having lent Dave the DVD, it would be silly of me to vote otherwise.

I really didn't think I'd love this movie as much as I do. After seeing the theatrical cut, I thought it was okay, but with a few annoying plot holes and (what seemed at the time) bits of sloppy storytelling. Still, I'm a zombie geek, so I bought the director's cut DVD. Thanks to new/replaced footage, all of those holes were filled and things made sense. It's also gorier, if that's your thing.

Been craving a sequel ever since, and although Zack Snyder had plans for a zombie companion piece, I won't hold my breath. But for those of you with access to torrent sites and such, I highly recommend a British mini-series called Dead Set (the premise is basically that the zombie outbreak occurs in the thick of a taping of the Big Brother reality show). Whether intentional or not, it serves as a sequel. Same types of fast moving, aggressive zombies. Same visual style. Same pacing.

As for the Dawn of the Dead remake, I have to confess, I like it a little bit -- just a little bit -- more than Romero's original. Blasphemy, I know.
Read the Quite Frankly column at Maximum Awesome

#4 Dave

    head idiot

  • Admin
  • 7,356 posts
  • no information
  • no information
  • Nine Inch Nails
  • Ohio State Buckeyes
  • New York Jets
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information

Posted 12 November 2009 - 02:24 PM

He's just producing the sequel, right?

Two things:
I don't think it's in the movie, but in the extra news footage on the DVD there's a woman from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) addressing reporters. Behind her in big jumbo official letters? Center for Disease etc. Without the 's'. I guess they lost one of the centers during the first wave.

In the theatrical version, did they have the video footage from the boat or was that only in the director's cut?
Maximum Awesome
"Proceed counterinductively." --Paul Feyerabend

#5 Frankie Pitt

    Atari 2600

  • Team Awesome
  • 363 posts

Posted 12 November 2009 - 04:56 PM

Actually, yeah. He was producing the follow-up, Army of the Dead, but hadn't committed to directing yet. Script was by some other dude...Joby Harold. As far as I know, the project is on indefinite hold (though if AMC's series adaptation of The Walking Dead is a success, things could change).

I never noticed that CDC thing. Could be a mistake, but it might also be a thing where the real CDC didn't want their name/logo used. Maybe...?

The boat footage from the end of the movie, all the stuff that ran during the closing credits, was part of the theatrical cut.
Read the Quite Frankly column at Maximum Awesome

#6 Dave

    head idiot

  • Admin
  • 7,356 posts
  • no information
  • no information
  • Nine Inch Nails
  • Ohio State Buckeyes
  • New York Jets
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information

Posted 13 November 2009 - 03:12 AM

View PostFrankie Pitt, on 12 November 2009 - 04:56 PM, said:

the real CDC didn't want their name/logo used. Maybe...?
Government agency. All they can do is prevent filming in their agency buildings. They can't stop the use of their name. Center/Centers is a common enough mistake.

Oh, man, I forgot to tell you today. That scene when the two buses are leaving the mall? There's a wide shot of the buses surrounded by an ocean of zombies. I shouted, "awesome," out loud. To myself. I might have made a fist pumping action too.

...and yet I can't get excited about Starship Troopers. So fickle.
Maximum Awesome
"Proceed counterinductively." --Paul Feyerabend

#7 Anticelebrity

    Barbie doll

  • Rookie
  • 37 posts
  • no information
  • no information
  • none
  • none
  • none
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information
  • no information

Posted 18 January 2010 - 07:38 PM

It's not bad for a Sunday afternoon film. A sequel could be good in a corny kind of way.